I've found at least one brochure from a later HLV-H that lists a 5 hp motor, and seems to imply VFD control. If Hardinge thought it was sufficient I'm inclined to agree. My Sharp clone is also a 5 HP motor on a VFD, and it's mounted halfway up the cabinet, not on the floor. The motor does have a somewhat noisy built in fan to avoid overheating at low speeds. There isn't the seemingly instant switch between high and low speed that you get on a native 3 phase machine (I'm also running the VFD derated on 240V residential input), but it's still pretty quick. The high/low switch simply redirects an input to the VFD to command different speeds rather than swapping windings. Braking speeds (with a braking resistor) seem similar to an actual HLV-H though I haven't timed either and have only used one HLV-H.
One perk of the VFD is that it was set up with a knob to change the ratio between high and low speeds. I usually leave mine closer to 2.5:1 or 3:1 rather than the 2:1 original. Wouldn't make or break my decision, but it is nice. One downside is that mine reads actual spindle speed from the VFD, so I don't know what speed it is until I turn it on. Not a big deal, I don't often have it over 2k rpm (can do 4k), so there's not a big risk of leaving it set at 4k, forgetting, putting on a chuck, then overspeeding it. If I'm not sure a quick start in low speed answers the question as well.
If I already had a mechanical drive in good condition I'd certainly consider keeping it. A 1 hp motor and drive are cheaper than a 5 hp drive, and 5 hp drives that run on 240V split phase are less common. The VFD that came in mine is a Yaskawa, though a recent chat with them advised that one of their microdrives would likely be sufficient for this application, and they're much lower priced than their fully featured drives.
The 5hp motor solution seemed like the best choice, but then I stumbled on a "like new" 2HP Baldor SuperE motor at 1/5 the cost, at 20 minutes driving distance, and bought it.
According to the calculations below (based on the principle that HP degrades proportionally to RPM below 60hz), the 2hp motor "becomes" a 0.5HP, once it's at 438 RPM
Hz | RPM | HP |
---|
60 | 1755 | 2 |
30 | 877.5 | 1 |
15 | 438.75 | 0.5 |
7.5 | 219.375 | 0.25 |
So, it's actually a slight improvement (in terms of HP at low RPM), over the stock motor, that has 0.5HP at 530 RPM written on its plate for low speed configuration.
Now, I'm going down the VFD choice "decision tree".
The Dura Pulse GS23-25p0 seems very will thought out. It's packed with features, the manual inspires confidence. :
https://www.automationdirect.com/ad...y_drives_(vfd)/general_purpose_vfds/gs23-25p0
If I could somehow predict I will be forever happy with the 2HP motor, I would get it with no second thoughts.
The downside, is that it's derated to 2.5HP when fed with single phase input, and should I ever want a bigger 5hp motor and stumble on great deal for one, I'll have to replace the VFD, and my 2.5HP will have been an expensive "temporary" solution.
If on the other hand, it turns out that 2hp does every thing I want, then the DuraPulse VFD will have been an excellent choice.
As a hobbyist who doesn't have to be "productive" (taking aggressive cut make things faster), I'm inclined to think that a "low power" lathe will suite me just fine, and that if the stock motor was "good enough" for tool room machinists in 1956 when the lathe was designed, it should be plenty good enough for me !
Another reason to think that I'll be happy with low power, is that I obsess much more about precision that I do about productivity, in fact my obsession with precision is probably anti productive to the point that I would get me fired if I was on a payroll !