John Garner
Titanium
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
- Location
- south SF Bay area, California
The Hamar laser systems that I'm somewhat familiar with are "alignment" lasers that illuminate a quad-cell-type photodetector, electronically measuring the in-detector-plane location where the beam hits the detector. There is no ability to measure location along the beam axis.
On the other hand, an interferometer is inherently a instrument for measuring along-beam displacement. Interferometer measurements of displacements across the beam and of rotations around axes perpendicular to the beam are performed by using supplemental beamsteering optics that perturb the length of the beam as a function of the parameter being measured.
There is a lot of overlap between the two technologies; with suitable supplemental optics either one can measure across-beam motion and rotation and machine-axis-squareness. But lead screw error mapping is the interferometer's territory, with a little bit of competition from the non-contacting-super-encoder type of linear position sensor such as the one Heidenhein markets.
John
On the other hand, an interferometer is inherently a instrument for measuring along-beam displacement. Interferometer measurements of displacements across the beam and of rotations around axes perpendicular to the beam are performed by using supplemental beamsteering optics that perturb the length of the beam as a function of the parameter being measured.
There is a lot of overlap between the two technologies; with suitable supplemental optics either one can measure across-beam motion and rotation and machine-axis-squareness. But lead screw error mapping is the interferometer's territory, with a little bit of competition from the non-contacting-super-encoder type of linear position sensor such as the one Heidenhein markets.
John