Ontario Hunter
Plastic
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2024
- Location
- Ontario
I'm looking for some info on a potential issue. Last year I built a 404 Jeffery on a 98 Mauser (Brno vz.24). The barrel was from Lidja in Montana and bottom metal was 416 Rem magnum from Swift-Blackburn. Bolt face was opened up by a local machinist and I did the rest. Project was completed in time for my August African safari (4th).
Recently I acquired a very nice used 98 Mauser stock to upgrade. Everything went well fitting my action into this stock until the very end. The tangs bottom and top will not pull together tight into stock slots. Not even close. This stock is obviously for a commercial action. The rear action screw socket is peened closed on the end to prevent the action screw from threading into the striker sear track and binding the bolt during opening. So I shortened the action screw (ground some off the end) to allow the tangs to be pulled together further. That helped but then the top of the magazine box bottomed out on the receiver. Timney trigger tip was also bottoming against the trigger guard. I happen to have another scrap commercial Mauser stock (broken and glued back together for stock making machine form). I checked the action screw holes for both and they are the same depth, about 0.03mm less than the tightest distance between tangs with mag box bottomed against the receiver.
So, I'm wondering if commercial Mausers had stocks significantly narrower through the wrist than military Mausers? Is the commercial magazine shorter in height? Unfortunately, I no longer have the military bottom metal to compare with Swift version but I can see from placement of corrosion on rear action screw threads that the Swift and military bottom metals must be very similar depth at rear. There is plenty of room remaining in the magazine box when fully loaded with three rounds so I'm sure I could cut down the back sides and end of the box without affecting capacity. However, going back to the other stock if it doesn't work out might be a problem as end plate for magazine would be shortened which might cause issues with pushing shells into the magazine getting hung up. Shortening the box will not affect cycling which has been perfected in rails, ramp, and extractor modifications. I suppose I could always remove some meat from the wrist of that stock and make it work if needed. The Timney trigger will be an easy fix. Trigger is steel. I will simply heat and reshape it as needed. Mechanism is all metal so nothing to melt.
Any thoughts would be appreciated before I decide to start grinding metal. Perhaps both "commercial" stocks were for another Mauser variant, not 98?
Recently I acquired a very nice used 98 Mauser stock to upgrade. Everything went well fitting my action into this stock until the very end. The tangs bottom and top will not pull together tight into stock slots. Not even close. This stock is obviously for a commercial action. The rear action screw socket is peened closed on the end to prevent the action screw from threading into the striker sear track and binding the bolt during opening. So I shortened the action screw (ground some off the end) to allow the tangs to be pulled together further. That helped but then the top of the magazine box bottomed out on the receiver. Timney trigger tip was also bottoming against the trigger guard. I happen to have another scrap commercial Mauser stock (broken and glued back together for stock making machine form). I checked the action screw holes for both and they are the same depth, about 0.03mm less than the tightest distance between tangs with mag box bottomed against the receiver.
So, I'm wondering if commercial Mausers had stocks significantly narrower through the wrist than military Mausers? Is the commercial magazine shorter in height? Unfortunately, I no longer have the military bottom metal to compare with Swift version but I can see from placement of corrosion on rear action screw threads that the Swift and military bottom metals must be very similar depth at rear. There is plenty of room remaining in the magazine box when fully loaded with three rounds so I'm sure I could cut down the back sides and end of the box without affecting capacity. However, going back to the other stock if it doesn't work out might be a problem as end plate for magazine would be shortened which might cause issues with pushing shells into the magazine getting hung up. Shortening the box will not affect cycling which has been perfected in rails, ramp, and extractor modifications. I suppose I could always remove some meat from the wrist of that stock and make it work if needed. The Timney trigger will be an easy fix. Trigger is steel. I will simply heat and reshape it as needed. Mechanism is all metal so nothing to melt.
Any thoughts would be appreciated before I decide to start grinding metal. Perhaps both "commercial" stocks were for another Mauser variant, not 98?