I see your sarcasm and understand it. But given the fact that artificial intelligence is already in a rather deep stage of development, ...
I think you have to define AI. Mostly, its currently used to mean pattern recognition, and well, marketing. Hardly Any current tech business plan hoping to get funded has to position itself as _______ + AI, that doesn't make y=mx+b artificial intelligence (as programmers are noted to joke about). Physicist and futurist Michio Kaku is his book Physics of the Future cites AI as one the least likely things to happen in the next 100 years and notes current best efforts are dwarfed by the intelligence of a beetle.
Based on so much of what is described as AI...me thinks too many are accepting the marketing departments definition. Not to say there aren't some great programming accomplishments, but that makes it really good programming, no necessarily AI (as say Kaku would define it)