across multiple different computers?
the difference was clear between ecc and non ecc computers. ECC are flat out more stable.
I agree with ECC, but actually I notice the bigger difference in #1 the graphics card drivers!
and #2workstation CPU reliability/stability
Nvidia even mentions the main reason in a pro video card is the reliability, stability, accuracy, and driver updates and reliability.
Pro video cards, especially when running with workstation processors(XEON) just work far better, not speed,
but the MAIN reason you buy workstation HW,
reliability, stability, and that includes drivers.
and gaming stuff vs pro stuff just isn't the same.
Its wicked fast, but that's it, everything else is less.
I have 2 workstations at the shop, 7 computers (4 modern gaming rigs) at home, One updated each year, ouch$$
and been running 3D related content for next to 30 years.
And to add AMD has never had the stability and reliability of intel, and neither has their video cards, even before they bought out ATI, ATI was junk.
there may be bigger computer nerds on here, but I have actually ran them.
I personally, and I know this is strange, would rather run older workstation hardware, than newer high speed gaming hardware.
the reliability, stability, accuracy are that different from my experience.
One of my workstations at the shop runs an old 8 core XEON with some Nvidia 4000 video card, ECC, and it NEVER has issues, it runs far better than running the same software on my sons top of the line water cooled
$3000-4000 gaming rig.
I have hacked copies of CAD/CAM at home on various rigs, depending on who needs which one. and I prefer the workstation hardware, even if its older slower.
Just my 2 cents
![Cheers :cheers: :cheers:](https://www.practicalmachinist.com/forum/pmsmilies/cheers.gif)