The story I heard was it was the 40th. Formula for the war dept. It worked so they called it WD-40.
Duhhhhhh. The War Dept Became the Defense Dept in 1947. WD 40 was developed in 1953.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The story I heard was it was the 40th. Formula for the war dept. It worked so they called it WD-40.
I use WD40 to keep my diving rods from getting rusty. But I have the wipe it off before I use them as it is a water dispersant, after all.
I thought you were the king of reading members minds to know what they really mean and when they really meant to be funny or not ?? Seeing as there is no such thing as a "diving rod" I'm guessing he actually did mean divining rodThought you said "divining rods" and thought we were gonna jump back into dowsing. That'd be good for another 5 pages.
we use astro coat to spray on parts to prevent rust
.
what is it
.
mineral spirits and asphalt (tar).......... when the mineral spirit evaporate it leave a thin layer of tar.
.
wd-40 magical secret ingredient is the perfume smell...... it makes the customer think it is special
spray with secret ingredients. thats all that matters keeping the customer satisfied they got
their moneys worth
.
i am guessing if they got rid of the smell they would sell a lot less
Thinking about it, if somebody isn't smart enough to properly care for their firearm then having them use a product that prevents said firearm from functioning may not be all that bad of a thing.
Years ago I bought a case of Starrett M1 on sale hoping it would be similar to Boeshield. It does have similar look, feel and smell, but "on sale" at least, was way less expensive. Unfortunately the M1 in my experience turned out to be not very good at rust prevention compared to Boeshield.In the late 1980s, a former coworker -- who was a serious offshore sailor -- showed me the then-current MSDS for Starrett M-1. M-1's
cncdumm, It is my understanding that aluminum oxide form very quickly on freshly machined aluminum. Your abrasive results could be the result of almost instantaneous formation of aluminum oxide on the face of the blocks you rubbed together. The less viscous WD40 could have let some abrasion occur that didn't occur with the thicker oil on the other plates. In other words, the source of abrasive material may have been the aluminum itself, not the WD40.
I still have my very first (and only) can of WD-40. It's about 30 years old. Still haven't found anything I want to use it for...
So I've now looked at this with three different techniques - one visual and two analytical - and I can find no evidence of any significant suspended solids down to US Standard Sieve size 60,000 (which is about 20X finer than FFFF grit for you ANSI guys). I'd be happy to describe my test methods but it's a little OT for this forum so I'll omit that unless somebody asks.
I don't know how to explain your results with the aluminum and it's certainly possible that I missed something, but as far as I can tell there's nothing in the stuff that could serve as an abrasive.
Notice
This website or its third-party tools process personal data (e.g. browsing data or IP addresses) and use cookies or other identifiers, which are necessary for its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. To learn more, please refer to the cookie policy. In case of sale of your personal information, you may opt out by sending us an email via our Contact Us page. To find out more about the categories of personal information collected and the purposes for which such information will be used, please refer to our privacy policy. You accept the use of cookies or other identifiers by closing or dismissing this notice, by scrolling this page, by clicking a link or button or by continuing to browse otherwise.